Warning: Parameter 1 to wp_default_styles() expected to be a reference, value given in /homepages/0/d239326961/htdocs/wordpress/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 571

Warning: session_start(): Cannot send session cookie - headers already sent by (output started at /homepages/0/d239326961/htdocs/wordpress/wp-includes/plugin.php:571) in /homepages/0/d239326961/htdocs/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/spambam/spambam.php on line 37

Warning: session_start(): Cannot send session cache limiter - headers already sent (output started at /homepages/0/d239326961/htdocs/wordpress/wp-includes/plugin.php:571) in /homepages/0/d239326961/htdocs/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/spambam/spambam.php on line 37

Warning: Parameter 1 to wp_default_scripts() expected to be a reference, value given in /homepages/0/d239326961/htdocs/wordpress/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 571
Best of Bweinh! — PC v. Apple Clash : Bweinh!

Best of Bweinh! — PC v. Apple Clash

July 24, 2007, 12:00 pm; posted by
Filed under Debate, Djere, Tom  | 2 Comments

Originally published on March 17, 2007.

In this corner, arguing for the PC, we have Tom!

And in this corner, arguing for Apple, is Djere!

The question of which platform is superior between PC and Macintosh is not a trivial matter. Thousands of lines of text in forums decry one, exalt the other, each citing a myriad of reasons their chosen platform is the best. Although the question of platformital superiority can be approached from a number of avenues, many of them are simply unimportant.

For example, one completely irrelevant way the platforms can be compared is the breadth of the software libraries available to each. What difference does it make that (as of press time) popular freeware/shareware website C-net.com listed a staggering 55,822 titles under “All Windows Software,” and just a paltry 4,603 listings for “All Mac Software”? What difference does it make that twelve times as many downloads were available on this popular and influential e-hemoth?

Another boneheaded way to compare operating systems is by looking at their popularity, relative to each other. Who on earth would think it relevant in any way to a real, honest debate about platforms that Apple had a paltry 2.4% of the market share in 2006 — in terms of real, worldwide shipments — versus a combined 50.6% for just the top 5 PC manufacturers? What do we care who the world trusts for its computing needs?

Likewise unimportant is the ability to customize your computer whenever you want. No one cares about upgrading a computer without replacing it, or performing system repairs on your own, or being taken seriously by friends, relatives, and co-workers.

No, the computer debate is about one thing — trust. Do you trust your children’s computing lives to a bunch of rag-tag, animating, photo-editing, long-haired, music-sharing hippie freaks?

Or do you trust the welcoming, all-encompassing embrace of Windows and its industrial brotherhood, the PC manufacturers?

PC. People Caring.

Failure reading drive C:
[A]bort, [I]gnore, [R]etry, or [F]ail?

Failure reading drive C:
[A]bort, [I]gnore, [R]etry, or [F]ail?

Failure reading drive C:
[A]bort, [I]gnore, [R]etry, or [F]ail?


Oh, hello there! I was just spending some time getting to know the zeroes and ones, first strung together in the 80s, that still form the foundation of the average Windows PC. While Microsoft prides itself on polishing its rubbish to a sheen gloss, mimicking the refined, elegant lines and textures of Mac OS X, what lies beneath is the same slathering of spaghetti code Bill Gates cooked up when Carter was in office.

Until recently, a head-to-head comparison of Mac to PC compared apples to oranges. But with Apple’s recent switch from IBM’s Power PC processors to Intel’s x86 architecture, direct comparisons can be made. Will I make them? No! I’m not a ‘Mac Evangelist.’ If you’re looking for one of those, check your local community college art department.

What I will tell you is this — Macs are more reliable because you have one source for a Mac: Apple. You can buy a Dell, an HP, an IBM, or you could build your own PC capable of running Windows. All those vendors and their configurations add lines of code to Windows’ OS, each zero and every one cutting into your performance. Apple has limited its hardware support to keep your Mac running smoothly every time you turn it on. And Mac OS X is based on the rock-solid UNIX operating system, so you’ll never have to see one of Bill Gates’ famous ‘Blue Screens of Death.’

Even if you ignore pro-Mac arguments like ease of use, lack of viruses, reliability, stability, power, and originality, you could still use Apple’s Boot Camp software, allowing you to run Windows on your Apple. Purchasing an Apple computer literally can give you the best of both worlds.

Now if you’ll excuse me…..

Failure reading drive C:
[A]bort, [I]gnore, [R]etry, or [F]ail?

Which side are you on?
View Results


2 Comments to “Best of Bweinh! — PC v. Apple Clash”

  1. David King on July 24th, 2007 5:38 pm

    Is there a Linux button?
    Hate to be negative, but both Microsoft and Apple are in love with their own profits, and are delusional about the quality of their products. Freeware is a) free and b) easily comparable in terms of service and quality.
    Let the reigns of software tyranny come down, and put the power to process posthaste into the hands of the populace.
    Viva la Ubuntu!

  2. Steve on July 24th, 2007 6:24 pm

    But this is about the actual machine, and Linux is just an operating system. We might do a Windows v. Linux clash sometime though.

Leave a comment!

Comment spam protected by SpamBam