11 Comments to “Presidential Selector Thingy”

1. aaron.guest on October 4th, 2007 8:13 am

   I’m at Theoretical Ideal Candidate 100%. That sounds good. I think I’ll have that.

2. Jesse on October 4th, 2007 10:19 am

   Yeah, I got Theoretical Ideal Candidate too. It must be because I checked way to many “None of the above” choices. Then Mike Gravel was next.

3. Rose on October 4th, 2007 10:22 am

   My number one was Duncan Hunter, followed very closely by Tom Tancredo, and my man Alan Keyes.

   My first democrat was number 18 - Bill Richardson.

4. Steve on October 4th, 2007 10:51 am

   EVERYONE gets “theoretical ideal candidate,” guys. It’s a representation of your answers, that the site then compares to the answers it has for everyone else.

   Rose, who was #1 out of the guys who actually might win?

5. Rose on October 4th, 2007 12:56 pm

   That would be Brownback then Romney.

6. MC-B on October 4th, 2007 2:15 pm

   Number 2 (after “Ideal Candidate”; silly and confusing to put that at #1 spot) was Bill Richardson for me, then #3 Obama. First Republican was #6 Mike Huckabee (I don’t count #5 Ron Paul); my first “top three” republican was Romney at #19.

7. Steve on October 4th, 2007 2:42 pm

   If I had to pick a Democrat, it would probably be Richardson. He was the second Democrat in my results, to Edwards.

   But I heard on the radio today that Mike Huckabee took this test and got Mitt Romney as his result, so I don’t know how well it works really.

8. David on October 4th, 2007 5:44 pm

   Huckabee 65%

   Romney 65%

   Keyes 60%

   (Hillary was @ 51%)

   I dont remember anyone else.

9. Dan on October 4th, 2007 10:55 pm

   Newt Gingrich, Brownback, Romney, Keyes, Thompson, McCain, Rudy. First Dem was.. Algore?? Bill Richardson would be the only Dem I would pick if I had to.

10. Chloe on October 5th, 2007 8:06 am

    So Hillary was #3 for me. I feel sullied.

11. David on October 5th, 2007 9:44 am

    Perhaps it simply shows how much Hillary has changed her message.

Leave a comment!